A C T I V E Networking that works...!

Welcome to friendsofgeorge - Networking at its best....!
Monday, December 16 2019 @ 05:29 am UTC



Financial burden could still await SA’s poor

In total, levies on petrol and diesel will increase by 29 cents and 30 cents per litre respectively. Image: AA South Africa
BUSINESS NEWS - While it seems as though South Africa’s low income earners have been given some relief in the new Budget, there may still be one more development in the pipeline that could weigh heavily on the poor.

This is according to Tertius Troost, a tax manager at Mazars, who explains that if one particular proposal related to paraffin, contained in the 2019 Budget Speech is brought to pass, the country’s poor could find their cost of living increasing significantly.

“The potential bad news for the country’s poor is that Treasury is looking at the viability of imposing a fuel levy on illuminating paraffin, which has not been subject to the fuel levy to date.”

In total, levies on petrol and diesel will increase by 29 cents and 30 cents per litre respectively.

The general fuel levy accounts for a 15 cents per litre increase, the Road Accident Fund (RAF) levy increases by five cents per litre from 3 April, and the new carbon fuel levy will amount to nine cents per litre for petrol and 10 cents per litre for diesel, applicable from 5 June.

“This in itself already poses a problem for the lower income tiers, since both personal and public transport will become more expensive. By adding the extra cost of the fuel levies to illuminating paraffin, which is used extensively in low income households, the cost of living for South Africa’s poor could increase significantly,” says Troost.

Treasury’s rationale behind imposing this added levy is somewhat unclear.

In the Budget Review document Treasury stated that “at present, fossil fuels such as mineral ethanol, illuminating paraffin, aviation kerosene, liquefied petroleum gas, compressed natural gas and biofuels are not subject to RAF levies. Yet they are used as transport fuels. This creates a discrepancy: claims can be made to the RAF for damages arising from accidents involving motor vehicles operating on fossil fuel sources, but these fuels are not subject to the RAF”.

In response Troost states: “Even though I agree that biofuels may be used as transport fuels, I am yet to hear of a vehicle running on illuminating paraffin.”

In addition, if Eskom’s current challenges persist, and South Africa experiences more rolling blackouts, many more South Africans are likely to experience the effect that the proposed levies could have on the price of paraffin, first hand.

“In terms of time lines, Treasury has not yet given any deadline for its decision regarding the matter, but it is expected that Treasury will review the scope and definition of fuel levy goods in the Customs and Excise Act. For now, we will just have to look out for future announcements,” Troost concludes.


The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.